The surgeon general has new social media guidelines. Minnesota already made some of them into law.
By Ravi Iyer of the University of Southern California
Discover what economists believe is keeping unemployment above 8%.
Prior to founding Footnote, Diana worked as a researcher at the Urban Institute, conducting studies and publishing numerous reports and policy briefs on criminal justice policy issues. She also founded the blog The Policy Brief to bring public policy research to a broader audience. Diana graduated magna cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa from Brown University with a degree in public policy and in religious studies.
By Diana Brazzell, Footnote
The recession officially ended in mid-2009 when we halted our economic freefall and slowly started to turn the ship around. But the recovery has progressed more sluggishly than people imagined it would – and slower than previous recoveries – and unemployment currently stands at 8.2%.1
With the recession officially over for almost three years, what is holding back employment from returning to pre-recession levels?(a) Economists have a lot of theories but the one that seems to get the most support is that there is a lack of demand.2 In the crisis, consumers lost jobs, housing equity, and stock investments they still haven’t recovered. With tight household budgets and uncertainty about the future, people have been keeping their pocketbooks closed.(b) Businesses don’t want to hire new workers or make other investments in expansion because the consumer demand isn’t there. Yet as long as consumers go without jobs, or without secure ones, they will hesitate to start spending again. This creates a “vicious cycle, ” according to Brookings Institution economist William Gale, which can take a long time to correct itself without some kind of outside intervention.
How do we know the problem is a lack of demand? First, because employers tell us so. Recent surveys of small business owners find that they most commonly identify weak sales as their main business concern. Labor data also support the “lack of demand” hypothesis. Companies are sitting on incredibly large cash reserves, so they have the resources to meet strong demand, if it exists, by increasing production.(c) This would entail hiring additional people or squeezing more work out of existing employees. We know companies aren’t doing much hiring, but we also know that they aren’t maximizing the workers they already have either. The length of the average workweek is still well below what it was before the recession hit.
The demand problem that is holding back private sector hiring is compounded by a jobs crisis in the public sector. Nearly a third of jobs lost in 2011 were in the public sector. The recession has left state and local governments with reduced tax revenues and shriveled pension funds, leading them to layoff large numbers of workers, particularly teachers.(d) Recent slow gains in private sector hiring have been offset by ongoing job loss in the public sector, in contrast to previous recessions.
Experts have offered other explanations as to why unemployment remains so stubbornly high through this jobless recovery. Although none seem to have quite as much support among economists as the “weak demand” hypothesis,2 here are a few of the most popular alternative theories:
In all likelihood, there are numerous factors interacting to hold back job growth, but the most important seems to be low demand. While Democrats and Republicans debate what role, if any, the government should play in boosting demand through further economic stimulus, businesses hope that the holiday season will be the start of robust consumer spending in the coming year.
Get in touch about this workA secure, centralized workspace where faculty upload notes, papers, and lecture materials—and instantly receive clear, accurate, publication-ready drafts across formats: op-eds, research briefs, executive summaries, pitches, public commentary, and more.
Discover More